Production Programs, Each With the Problem That Was Hard
These are not portfolio photos. Each page follows the same structure: the brief, the process route, the measured parameters, and the part of the job that was genuinely difficult. That last section is the one buyers read first.
What we publish, and why
Client names are withheld under confidentiality. Numbers in each case are our verified process capability, not a claim about the customer's product performance.
LED Lighting
An Integrated Heat-Sink Housing, Extruded as One Part
Profile ±0.05 mm
Read the case study
Optical Communication
A Precision Heat Sink Held to ±0.05 mm Fin Pitch
Fin pitch ±0.05 mm
Read the case study
Consumer Electronics
A 0.3 mm Thin-Wall Housing in One Extrusion Route
Wall 0.3 mm
Read the case study
Wearables
A TWS Charging Case With 0.3 mm Walls and a Tight Hinge Fit
Hinge fit
Read the case study
Medical Devices
6061-T6 Structural Parts for a CT System
6061-T6
Read the case studyAudio
An Extruded Speaker Enclosure With Consistent Wall Thickness
Wall uniformity
Read the case studyFour sections that matter, one that matters most
Most supplier case studies are a photograph and an adjective. These pages are structured so you can check the claim.
The Brief
What the customer needed, in one quantified constraint — not a marketing summary.
The Route
The actual sequence: alloy, die, extrusion, machining, finishing, inspection.
Key Parameters
The numbers the part had to hold, and where they came from.
Where It Was Difficult
The failure mode we had to design around, and what we changed. Read this one first.
Have a Part That Looks Like One of These?
Send the drawing and tell us which case is closest. We will start the review from the problem that case actually had.
What to send
- 2D drawing or 3D model (STEP, IGES, DWG, DXF, PDF)
- Alloy and temper
- Surface finish and color
- Estimated annual quantity